<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard&#039;s blog &#187; marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardjackson.org/tag/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardjackson.org</link>
	<description>Life in Melbourne.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Semiotics?</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2010/06/27/semiotics/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2010/06/27/semiotics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[







On Nicholson St in Carlton.
I love the heritage of some of these signs. They have an earnest artlessness that imparts a real sense of place and time. Artlessness isn&#8217;t something that goes much with marketing, where the awareness and associations tend to be managed to the nth degree. Even seeming artlessness is often highly staged, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp64e8PTI/AAAAAAAAEnM/vuxa9xr8qJ8/s912/IMG_1115.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcpzuDDR2I/AAAAAAAAEm0/7IRew2R5nhQ/s912/IMG_1104.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp8aTpxEI/AAAAAAAAEnQ/zE3JdFx94yc/s912/IMG_1117.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp0Yl8TUI/AAAAAAAAEm4/RkHCm7H631o/s912/IMG_1105.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp1sNiPMI/AAAAAAAAEm8/Zi8I6bWKxFg/s912/IMG_1107.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp2mFVR6I/AAAAAAAAEnA/QWYx991JmgI/s912/IMG_1108.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp4yzDuGI/AAAAAAAAEnE/degMaGB6GfM/s912/IMG_1109.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/TCcp5rTYIOI/AAAAAAAAEnI/1h6fWJDSO4A/s912/IMG_1113.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>On Nicholson St in Carlton.<br />
I love the heritage of some of these signs. They have an earnest artlessness that imparts a real sense of place and time. Artlessness isn&#8217;t something that goes much with marketing, where the awareness and associations tend to be managed to the nth degree. Even seeming artlessness is often highly staged, such as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zr7pkJ5V2Hw">RACV&#8217;s Jason call centre ads</a> or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjQWZZ_6fYA">iinet&#8217;s BOB</a>. I reckon there&#8217;s a case for preserving as much true, authentic artlessness as you can find in a heritage brand. Where people have become wary of agency schmick and having their psychology over-understood, artlessness is a refreshing reminder of a different meaning for consumer orientation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2010/06/27/semiotics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is what well researched on-message comms looks like</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2010/05/29/this-is-what-well-researched-on-message-comms-looks-like/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2010/05/29/this-is-what-well-researched-on-message-comms-looks-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/2010/05/29/this-is-what-well-researched-on-message-comms-looks-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://richardjackson.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/p_1600_1200_84D67DCA-17AC-4E27-BFF1-DD8A09FCE9B9.jpeg"><img src="http://richardjackson.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/p_1600_1200_84D67DCA-17AC-4E27-BFF1-DD8A09FCE9B9.jpeg" alt="" width="225" height="300" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-364" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2010/05/29/this-is-what-well-researched-on-message-comms-looks-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conspicuous Consumption &#8211; Costco Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2010/04/28/conspicuous-consumption-costco-melbourne/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2010/04/28/conspicuous-consumption-costco-melbourne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We were talking about Costco in my brand management class so I had to go and check it out for myself. Thanks to my friend JB and his wife E for showing me around the joint.
It is another world that exists according to another logic entirely. 

In my world, I look to buy the smallest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/S9gdxrYqB3I/AAAAAAAAEFo/sihpDXynFLo/s912/IMG_0299.JPG" alt="COSTCO MELBOURNE" /></p>
<p>We were talking about Costco in my brand management class so I had to go and check it out for myself. Thanks to my friend JB and his wife E for showing me around the joint.</p>
<p>It is another world that exists according to another logic entirely. </p>
<ul>
In my world, I look to buy the smallest size of anything in groceries because I live alone and don&#8217;t use a lot of stuff. In the Costco World, sugar comes in 25kg bags. </ul>
<ul>
In my world, $5699 Cartier watches are found in a luxurious branded environment where the retail experience is at least part of the brand associations. In the Costco world a $5699 watch is mere paces from the twelve pack socks. </ul>
<ul>
In my world, you buy a Royal Doulton figurine, a treadmill, 10kgs of dogfood, artisan bread, a pair of jeans and a $150,000 emerald ring at different stores. In the Costco world there is no reason to leave the building. </ul>
<ul>
<p>In my world, you pay for things when you shop. In the Costco world you pay to shop: an annual membership fee. There is a fair bit of membership card flashing (to get in, at the register, at the entrance to the booze section, etc.)</ul>
<p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/S9geaWS7RiI/AAAAAAAAEHI/n6BEMWcDiRc/s912/IMG_0254.JPG" alt="GET ENGAGED AT COSTCO" /></p>
<p>From a cultural level, consumption at this level of conspicuousness is quite confronting. Supermarkets by comparison seem tame. The amount of product in a supermarket seems somehow manageable or <em>imaginable</em>. The sheer quantity of product at Costco is a monument to the project of consumption in our society and the sheer logistics of catering to the consumption habits we have. Of course, Costco deliberately sets out to generate patterns of consumption (there is nothing like buying in bulk to get you to consume in bulk). At times I felt a sense of revulsion and at others a profound sense of wellbeing. Costco may not be pleasurable, but it is certainly arousing and invokes feelings of human dominance.</p>
<p>All my photos <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/rjdotorg/Costco#">here</a>. </p>
<p><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_ThR3R25Swd0/S9geregeceI/AAAAAAAAEHw/t_0Z-57FRm4/s720/IMG_0288.JPG" alt="VEGEMITE!" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2010/04/28/conspicuous-consumption-costco-melbourne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japanese product philosophy</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2009/03/28/japanese-product-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2009/03/28/japanese-product-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A product should be a joy, bringing happiness equally to the manufacturer, seller, and purchaser. If the product makes the manufacturer and seller happy, but not the purchaser, your business has strayed from the honorable path.&#8221; Sontoku Ninomiya, philosopher. From Tabio website.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A product should be a joy, bringing happiness equally to the manufacturer, seller, and purchaser. If the product makes the manufacturer and seller happy, but not the purchaser, your business has strayed from the honorable path.&#8221; Sontoku Ninomiya, philosopher. From <a href="http://tabio.com/uk/corporate/about/history/">Tabio website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2009/03/28/japanese-product-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boy Shampoo, Girl Shampoo</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2008/06/01/boy-shampoo-girl-shampoo/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2008/06/01/boy-shampoo-girl-shampoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, there are humanitarian crises in Darfur, Burma and China that no-one&#8217;s doing much about, and that&#8217;s because we, in the first world, have our priorities right: what the world really needs is more varieties of shampoo. Particularly, shampoo that is specifically marketed towards genders &#8211; because the needs of women&#8217;s and men&#8217;s egos, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, there are humanitarian crises in Darfur, Burma and China that no-one&#8217;s doing much about, and that&#8217;s because we, in the first world, have our priorities right: what the world really needs is more varieties of shampoo. Particularly, shampoo that is specifically marketed towards genders &#8211; because the needs of women&#8217;s and men&#8217;s egos, I mean hair, are so radically different, and having hundreds of admixtures of basically the same chemicals in different packaging is so useful, helpful and orienting. Here&#8217;s two newbies I picked up in Safeway:<br />
<img src="http://www.richardjackson.org/images/blog/shampoo01.jpg" alt="Shampoos" /><br />
OK. So I&#8217;m a boy. I need boy shampoo why?<br />
<img src="http://www.richardjackson.org/images/blog/shampoo02.jpg" alt="Shampoos" /><br />
Because it&#8217;s mating season. Aha. This shampoo will make me sexy. Using girl shampoo (no doubt it contains estrogens or something that might make me sensitive and interested in women-things) will not help me in mating season.<br />
Girls on the other hand can get fully lathered over the Peter Morrissey Fashion Designer Range Sunsilk with &#8211; wait for it &#8211; crystal dust:<br />
<img src="http://www.richardjackson.org/images/blog/shampoo03.jpg" alt="Shampoos" /><br />
by which I think they might mean mica. I&#8217;m totally drawn to the cachet of this limited edition, it&#8217;s so rockstar and yet so approachable. On the back, it&#8217;s even got a testimonial spiel by Peter Morrissey himself in what might well be his own handwriting and words:<br />
<img src="http://www.richardjackson.org/images/blog/shampoo04.jpg" alt="Shampoos" /><br />
And best of all, I can have the aura of a glamorous woman who can afford to wear charcoal-sequined Peter Morrissey all without leaving the shower. Insert your own X-rated mental images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2008/06/01/boy-shampoo-girl-shampoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Product vs Environment: 1806</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2008/05/17/product-vs-environment-1806/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2008/05/17/product-vs-environment-1806/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1806 has REALLY GOOD COCKTAILS. Well mixed, well thought out, my guess is they exemplify what cocktails should be like&#8230; but usually aren&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t taste the alcohol &#8211; everything blends mysteriously into an amazing new flavour. The drink has perfume. Anyway&#8230; product&#8217;s great, service is even really good and&#8230; something&#8217;s wrong with the decor. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.1806.com.au">1806</a> has REALLY GOOD COCKTAILS. Well mixed, well thought out, my guess is they exemplify what cocktails should be like&#8230; but usually aren&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t taste the alcohol &#8211; everything blends mysteriously into an amazing new flavour. The drink has perfume. Anyway&#8230; product&#8217;s great, service is even really good and&#8230; something&#8217;s wrong with the decor. IMHO. And maybe the building/location. And music. Not fatally wrong &#8211; I&#8217;ll still go there on the strength of the product. </p>
<p>Hard to pin down &#8211; a bit low on polish &#038; surprise? No interior designer finesse? A bit too pubby? S thinks it&#8217;s the lighting and the music is wrong. Music should perhaps be jazz &#8211; 1806 prides itself on its historical cocktails so why not some historical hooch music. I think maybe more clutter, some veils and partitions, more couches, and less signage outside. It&#8217;s already on a main road. There&#8217;s other possibilities too &#8211; maybe we aren&#8217;t the chosen demographic, or maybe this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;pretentious city nook-bar&#8221; bar. Maybe it&#8217;s like the plain-looking girl who&#8217;s content to sit it out and wait for the boy who&#8217;ll like her for who she is and what she does, rather than her looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2008/05/17/product-vs-environment-1806/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimmicks II: designer paper bags for beer.</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-ii-designer-paper-bags-for-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-ii-designer-paper-bags-for-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen up: drinking beer from a bottle in a paper bag is cool. On the street, with a beanie, and some clandestine attitude. With the bag in place, people can&#8217;t see it&#8217;s alcohol, so it&#8217;s less offensive PLUS you get the added thrill of fooling people.
So given this coolness, it&#8217;s needless to say the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen up: drinking beer from a bottle in a paper bag is cool. On the street, with a beanie, and some clandestine attitude. With the bag in place, people can&#8217;t see it&#8217;s alcohol, so it&#8217;s less offensive PLUS you get the added thrill of fooling people.</p>
<p>So given this coolness, it&#8217;s needless to say the world was calling out for the <a href="http://tedcreated.com.au/">Ted696 project</a>, an effortlessly logical blend of art competition and bogan street drinking. Competitors design an artsy bag in just the right size to caressingly sleeve a (new) 696mL size bottle of Tooheys Extra Dry.</p>
<p>Duh, even with the extra culture, blind Myrtle could tell you were an alco from half a mile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-ii-designer-paper-bags-for-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimmicks I: Wind-powered cosmetics</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-i-wind-powered-cosmetics/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-i-wind-powered-cosmetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I totally know some faffy pseudovegan yuppies who would totally modify their beauty routines to ensure that it was all &#8220;energy friendly.&#8221; Also would be great if the energy used to cart all that product all the way from Blaine, Minnesota, were generated by wind energy too. But they won&#8217;t be mentioning that.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.richardjackson.org/images/blog/aveda.jpg" alt="Aveda Wind Energy" /></p>
<p>I totally know some faffy pseudovegan yuppies who would totally modify their beauty routines to ensure that it was all &#8220;energy friendly.&#8221; Also would be great if the energy used to cart all that product all the way from Blaine, Minnesota, were generated by wind energy too. But they won&#8217;t be mentioning that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2008/04/30/gimmicks-i-wind-powered-cosmetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muji philosophy &#8211; corporate Buddhism?</title>
		<link>http://richardjackson.org/2008/03/11/muji-philosophy-corporate-buddhism/</link>
		<comments>http://richardjackson.org/2008/03/11/muji-philosophy-corporate-buddhism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardjackson.org/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenya Hara, creative director of Muji: 
Muji was born&#8230; to create products designed not to make the shopper feel &#8220;I&#8217;ve got to have this,&#8221; but to inspire the feeling of &#8220;this is good enough for me,&#8221; because people don&#8217;t live only by their desires. The capacity to choose and judge what is &#8220;good enough for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenya Hara, creative director of Muji: </p>
<blockquote><p>Muji was born&#8230; to create products designed not to make the shopper feel &#8220;I&#8217;ve got to have this,&#8221; but to inspire the feeling of &#8220;this is good enough for me,&#8221; because people don&#8217;t live only by their desires. The capacity to choose and judge what is &#8220;good enough for me&#8221;, without shopping for status, is something to be proud of. (Monocle 11)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardjackson.org/2008/03/11/muji-philosophy-corporate-buddhism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
